Belmont Thornton Logo
Claim Back Loan Insurance

Recover PPI

Lifestyle protection; payment break plan; accident, sickness and unemployment cover; Lifechoices; and Payment Cover - these are just a few of the many other names by which PPI is known.

PPI stands for Payment Protection Insurance and it is a type of insurance cover designed to provide a financial safety-net for borrowers. Sold, for more than 30 years, alongside mortgages, loans and credit cards it is supposed to step in and take over debt repayments if the policyholder cannot work due to accident, sickness or unemployment. The problem with PPI is it is very expensive and can offer very little in the way of real protection. The cover has also been widely mis-sold and has hit the headlines on numerous occasions for all the wrong reasons. As a consequence, many people have been left angry and frustrated and have sought to recover PPI.

Although PPI is a long established product its reputation has been badly tarnished by controversy. Below we take a look at the timeline of the PPI scandal.

1998 Which? magazine expresses concern regarding the high costs and exclusions associated with PPI policies.

1998-2005 A number of UK newspapers write exposes regarding the PPI market.

September 2005 The Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) issues a 'super complaint' regarding PPI and the way in which it is sold. The CAB dubs the PPI industry 'the country's biggest protection racket.'

October 2005 In response to the CAB complaint and subsequent media coverage, there is a rise in the number of people trying to recover PPI.

November 2005 The Financial Services Authority (FSA) publishes a provisional report regarding the sale of PPI using information gathered through mystery shopping exercises. It reveals concerns regarding poor selling techniques and a lack of compliance processes.

September/ October 2006 The FSA fines a number of smaller companies for mis-selling PPI. It also issues a further report containing evidence of more compliance issues. As a result, many people mis-sold PPI by these companies start to make claims to recover PPI.

October 2006 The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) issues its own report and announces it will refer the mis-selling issue to The Competition Commission.

January-February 2007 The FSA fines some of the larger lenders guilty of mis-selling. Those fined include:

  • Alliance and Leicester (fined £7 million)
  • Capital One (fined £175,000)
  • Egg (fined £721,000)
  • GE Capital - provider of storecards including: Topshop, Debenhams and Asda (fined £610,000)
  • HFC Bank, also trading as 'Household bank' and 'Beneficial Finance' (fined £1,085,000)
  • Liverpool Victoria (fined £840,000)

The high profile nature of some of the lenders fined led to a surge in press interest. This, in turn, led to an uplift in the amount of unhappy customers seeking to recover PPI.

January 2008 The Competition Commission issues a report on the sale of PPI.

April 2008 The Competition Commission issues two further reports highlighting issues with PPI and its sale.

May 2008 Which? publishes research into PPI sold with loans. It claims as many as £2 million people have been sold policies they are unable to make a claim against.

September 2008 Which? publishes a further report regarding the sale of PPI with credit cards. Their research shows up to 1.3 million people took out PPI believing it would improve their chances of being approved for credit. The Which? report draws attention to the failings of many lenders and an increased number of unhappy customers begin to recover PPI mis-sold with their credit card.

May 2009 The FSA bans the notorious single-premium PPI policy. This type of cover has previously attracted a great deal of criticism as it is expensive and often does not cover the policyholder for the whole life of the loan.

September 2009 The FSA announces it intends to take tough measures to protect customers of mis-selling by introducing new guidelines.

October 2010 The British Banking Association (BBA) requests a judicial review of the new FSA guidelines.

April 2011 The High Court completes its review of the case and finds in favour of the FSA.

May 2011 The BBA announces it will not challenge the court's decision.

May 2011 Several of the country's largest banks announce the provision of funds to deal with the PPI issue including:

  • Lloyds £3.2 billion
  • Barclays £1 billion
  • RBS £850 million
  • HSBC £270 million
  • Co-op £90 million

If you would like to recover PPI mis-sold on a mortgage, loan, hire purchase agreement, store or credit card then we can help. Fill out our claim form above or call us today on 0207 471 2000.

Tell a Friend
blog comments powered by Disqus

Enquiry Form

First Name 
Last Name 
Mobile Phone
Home Phone
Address Line 1 
Post Code 
Claim Back Mis-Sold PPI Button

Loan claim: Building societies warn of house price bubble

The Building Societies Association (BSA) is the latest to warn about the potential house price bubble that could arise f...

Bank claim: Lloyds raised concerns on Co-op finances

Lloyds Banking Group was aware that the financial position of the Co-Operative bank was unstable, said Lloyds chief exec...

Loan claim: first time buyers locked out for a decade

First time buyers will have to save up their deposit on a house for more than ten years, according to research from the ...

Bank charges: Commission tackles issue of RBS

The weak position of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is damaging to the UK economy, according to the Parliamentary Comm...

Bank charges: Report says customers and taxpayers were failed

Customers and taxpayers have been failed by the financial sector, according to the final report from the Parliamentary C...

Belmont Thornton Limited is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of regulated claims management activities; FRN:838450

Belmont Thornton Limited is incorporated in England and Wales, Company number 6621233, whose head office at Unit B11, Kestrel Court, Harbour Road, Portishead, Bristol, BS20 7AN and registered office at Harwood House, 43 Harwood Road, London, SW6 4QP.

Belmont Thornton Limited is registered with the Information Commissioners Office. Registration number Z1728023.

Please note that calls may be monitored for the purposes of staff training.

* Belmont Thornton operates on a "No Win No Fee" basis. This means that there are no upfront costs to pay. Our fee only becomes payable on a successful outcome of a claim. A cancellation fee is payable if you decide that having instructed Belmont Thornton to act on your behalf, and after 14 days of signing your Letter of Authority, you do not wish to continue pursuing your claim with us. The cancellation fee is the reasonable costs incurred for the work undertaken. Please see our terms of engagement.

By using our web-site, you agree that we can place the types of cookies described in our privacy policy on your device.Hide